Tag Archives: Sherman Alexie

Banned book backfire

Parents call cops on teen for giving away banned book; it backfires predictably

Source: http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/219767/parents-call-cops-on-teen-for-giving-away-banned-book-it-backfires-predictably/?utm_source=share-fb&utm_medium=button

Parents in Idaho called the cops last week on junior-high student Brady Kissel when she had the nerve to help distribute a book they’d succeeded in banning from the school curriculum.

Absolute True DiaryThe book in question was Sherman Alexie’s young adult novel The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. Published in 2007, it won the National Book Award and has become popular with young teens, supposedly for its universal themes of fitting in, making sense of race, and sexual discovery.

The sex part (and let’s face it—probably the race part) led parents to lobby Junior Mountain High School to remove it from the syllabus, citing its sexual content (it discusses masturbation) and supposedly anti-Christian content.

Local teens then started a petition to have the book reinstated. They collected 350 signatures, which is an impressive number of kids to rally around a cause like reading.

In response, a local bookstore Rediscovered Books started a crowdfunding campaign to buy a book for each of the 350 kids who signed the petition. It worked—the campaign raised $3,400, enough for a book per kid.

Rediscovered Books worked with a student involved in the petition, Brady Kissel, to distribute the books on World Book Night, an initiative to turn reluctant young readers onto reading with free, super-readable books.

They distributed all but 20 books to kids who came in to claim them, but not before parents called the cops to shut down the operation. Police told local news channel KBOI they had been called by “someone concerned about teenagers picking up a copy of the book without having a parent’s permission.”

Even police seemed to have no idea what they were doing there, and let the book giveaway proceed as planned.

Not only did it go as planned, but when Alexie’s publisher Hachette got word of the incident, they sent Rediscovered an additional 350 copies on the house. So while the book may still be banned in the school curriculum, it’s available free of cost for any kid who wants to stop into Rediscovered and pick one up.

Leave a comment

Filed under 2016, books

White Writer Makes “Best Poetry” — With An Asian Pen Name

Poet Michael Derrick Hudson was published in The Best American Poetry 2015 anthology under the name “Yi-Fen Chou.” Hudson claims to use this name as a “strategy” for getting poems published.

by Isaac Fitzgerald

Source: http://www.buzzfeed.com/isaacfitzgerald/yi-fen-chou-is-michael-derrick-hudson#.ljkm9RZAe1

The poetry world was shocked Monday to discover that Yi-Fen Chou, a poet who appears in the anthology The Best American Poetry 2015, is actually the pen name of Michael Derrick Hudson.

Michael Derrick Hudson a/k/a Yi-Fen Chou via poetryfoundation.org

Michael Derrick Hudson a/k/a Yi-Fen Chou via poetryfoundation.org

Hudson’s poem “The Bees, the Flowers, Jesus, Ancient Tigers, Poseidon, Adam and Eve” was both originally published in Prairie Schooner and reprinted in The Best American Poetry 2015 under the name Yi-Fen Chou.

Hudson poem

In his bio for the anthology, Hudson admits that he used the pen name of Yi-Fen Chou as a strategy for getting his poems accepted by literary journals:

Hudson bio

Many in the literary community took to social media to raise their concerns about the publication of Hudson’s poem in light of his nom de plume.

But Sherman Alexie, guest editor of The Best American Poetry 2015 — and in some sense originally a victim of a hoax — defended his decision to publish the poem, even after learning that Yi-Fen Chou was a pseudonym.

Details at: http://www.buzzfeed.com/isaacfitzgerald/yi-fen-chou-is-michael-derrick-hudson#.ljkm9RZAe1

Leave a comment

Filed under 2015, poet

E-book pricing: lawsuit filed

Source: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-apple-authors-20120413,0,6062761.story

Lawsuit against Apple: Writers wary of action by Dept. of Justice

Michael Connelly and Sherman Alexie are among authors who view the Justice Department’s suit against Apple and five publishers as acting against writers’ interests.

By Carolyn Kellogg, Los Angeles Times

April 13, 2012

When the Department of Justice and state officials announced their lawsuits against Apple and five major publishers Wednesday, it sent a ripple of anxiety through the talent at the industry’s heart.

“I’m in a bit of an awkward position because this has pitted my publisher against the retailer that far and away sells more of my books than any other,” says Michael Connelly, the bestselling mystery novelist. “I don’t want to bite the hand that feeds me, and both of these hands feed me.”

Connelly is published by Little, Brown, which is owned by Hachette, one of the publishers named in the suits that has since agreed to settle.

The scrutiny given to Apple’s alleged arrangement with the publishers — they are accused of colluding to raise the price of e-books, which they have denied — is largely perceived in publishing as shifting the balance of power in bookselling to Amazon. Publishers rely on Amazon as a major source of print book sales and have generally cooperated with its policies. When it launched the Kindle, Amazon deeply discounted e-book prices and offset the loss with profits from other parts of its business. Apple has been the first significant alternative to Amazon as an e-book retailer.

“I think the DOJ’s suit is misguided,” explains Andrew Wylie, the most powerful agent in publishing, who counts a number of Nobel Prize-winners among his 800 clients. “I think it is acting against the interests of culture and diversity in publishing. I think it is acting against the interests of authors.”

In part, that’s because the pricing of e-books directly affects the way authors can earn a living — and the publishing ecosystem that sustains them. “I know for a fact that my publishers and my editors publish books that they know are going to lose money but they think should be of the world,” says National Book Award-winning writer Sherman Alexie. “The John Grishams of the world support the experimental nature of publishing.” The DOJ’s suit, he says, “gave Amazon explicit permission to go for a total monopoly.”

Connelly observes that the DOJ suit seems to be unbalanced. “I believe in fair play. So I feel that if the government is going to step in and put controls on how publishers act to ensure a competitive marketplace, then I hope the government will be just as vigilant in guarding this amazing, creative and important industry from being monopolized by one entity,” he says. ” Amazon spreads my work far and wide. You can’t beat that. I’m very grateful. But I don’t want a world where there are no bookstores or other venues for discovering my work or the work of any other writers.”

For a writer just starting out, the suit served as a reminder that publishing is in flux. “I love writing and am going to continue writing, but having all my eggs in one basket is kind of scary,” says Elliott Holt, whose debut novel will be published by Penguin in 2013.

carolyn.kellogg@latimes.com

Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times

[Editor’s note: while I read and enjoy the works of Michael Connelly and Sherman Alexie, I don’t think the lawsuit is “misguided.” I think colluding to fix prices is misguided and as history shows, only furthers to protect the profits of those on the inside (Those fixing the prices.) at the expensive of those on the outside (Those having to pay them). Apple should not be allowed to set prices and neither should Amazon, but in this case it appears that Apple with the aid of publishers was doing just that, which profited them at the expense of book buyers. To read earlier articles on this, click on one of the Category listings below: e-book, publishers, or publishing.]

Leave a comment

Filed under authors, e-book, publishers, publishing