Tag Archives: book banning

“Will I be burnt next?” – Into the River author Ted Dawe on book banning

Award-winning book banned in New Zealand. First time in 22 years.

by Simon Collins

Source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11509128

The author of the first book to be banned in New Zealand for at least 22 years is asking: “Will I be burnt next?”

Ted Dawe, 64, the head of studies at Taylors College for international students in Auckland, is the unlikely subject of the first interim restriction order on a book under the Films, Videos and Publications Classification Act 1993.

His award-winning book for teenagers, Into The River, has been banned from sale or supply under the order issued by the president of the Film and Literature Board of Review, Dr Don Mathieson, QC.

The order took effect when it was issued on September 3 and applies until the full board meets to decide on a permanent classification for the book. Dr Mathieson said that would be as soon as possible and “may very well be at the end of this month”.

In the meantime, media law expert Professor Ursula Cheer has said it was illegal to supply the book even to a friend.

“Having it for your own personal use is okay. Passing it around to your friends is not,” she said.

Mr Dawe said he was “blindsided” by the ban, which was sought by lobby group Family First after deputy chief censor Nic McCully removed a previous R14 restriction on the book on August 14, making it totally unrestricted.

“It’s extraordinary,” Mr Dawe said. “I’ve had quite a few emails from people who share that sense of outrage. Do we live in a country where books get banned? I’ll get burnt next.”

He said Family First director Bob McCoskrie and Dr Mathieson, who wrote a dissenting view advocating an R18 restriction when the majority of the board rated the book R14 in 2013, were overstepping the rules of a democratic society.

“Those two individuals are united in their determination to establish this as a line that will not be crossed. I feel they have wildly overstepped the whole mechanism of looking at art and making judgments on it,” he said.

“New Zealand has taken a giant step towards that sort of regulatory moralising that I think most people felt we had left far in our past.”

He said it was not easy to write a book that teenagers would want to read, or to get it published.

“People involved with teaching boys, especially English teachers, know how important books like this are because they speak to boys about the things that other boys’ books don’t have the firepower or the vitality to do effectively,” he said.

“The book was never about sex and drugs, it was always about bullying people and how that damages people for the rest of their lives. That is really the underlying theme, everything else is just the trappings that go along with that.”

Ms McCully’s decision last month quoted another writer for teenagers Bernard Beckett as saying that sex, violence and bad language were common in books that were taught in schools such as his own 2014 novel Home Boys, which “includes a boy showing his friend how he masturbates, and ends with an explicit sex scene”.

“Thinking back to the classic school texts, Catcher in the Rye started it all,” he said. “A Clockwork Orange is as brutal as they come, and is frequently taught in senior school.”

Libraries Association director Joanna Matthew said Auckland Libraries submitted a British graphic novel Lost Girls to the censor this year because it included images of sexual activity by children. The censor rated it R18.

But she said libraries generally supported freedom of speech and saw the ban on Into The River as “a tragedy”.

“If we censor literature that talks frankly about some of these issues, then I think we run the risk of burying them,” she said.

“We would be much more effective as a society if we worked to counter the problems that the book articulates rather than trying to restrict the book.”

The NZ Booksellers Association has placed a notice on its website warning bookshops that they face fines of up to $3000 for an individual or $10,000 for a business if they supply the book.

However the book is still on sale on Amazon at US$24.99 in paperback or US$9.99 on Kindle.

Source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11509128

Leave a comment

Filed under 2015, book banning, books

Rising to the Challenge: How The Book Internet Delivered Books to Teens

by Kelly Jensen

Source: http://bookriot.com/2015/09/04/rising-challenge-book-internet-delivered-books-teens/

Earlier this summer, we talked about a book challenge that took place at West Ashley High School in Charleston, South Carolina. Though it wasn’t the first nor will it be the last book challenge we talk about here, this one hit me in a way that others I’ve read about or experienced hadn’t: Some Girls Are by Courtney Summers is a book about bullying, about girl-on-girl violence, and about sexual violence. It’s the kind of book that teens — especially teen girls — would benefit from picking up, reading, and more, talking about during their first classes in their first year in high school. The book was not an assigned title, but rather, it was one of the choices the teens could pick to read. No one forced them to read it. Leila’s post above, as well as this piece from the National Coalition Against Censorship, break down the pieces of how one upset parent forced the hand of the school to ignore their own challenge policy and remove the title from the list.

I’m a former teen librarian, and over the course of my career, I had two parents bring issues to me with materials available in the library. In one instance, a parent was upset that her 12-year-old was listening to a book where the main character’s father was a playboy father and called it completely and utterly inappropriate for her child. In response, I wrote that parent a letter and agreed with her: perhaps it was inappropriate for her child. But my responsibility as a teen librarian is to serve the diverse array of readers using the public collection, not to parent her child. I would be doing nothing about the book.

In the second instance, an award-winning and well-revered graphic novel was returned with a letter from a parent to my library director. This parent felt that the book’s manner of referencing a character’s erection was completely inappropriate for a fourth grader. Because this letter left me speechless, I kept a copy of it. Here it is:

I recently was alerted to a book by my 10-year-old daughter that is extremely inappropriate for the target age it was published for.

The first 1/4 or so of the book makes continual reference to the young superhero’s public humiliation via an erection that showed through his tights, as a result of his attraction to a girl.

It’s not just a mention — it’s a glorification of it over and over.

I can’t imagine that this has a place in the children’s section, or that young adults would be interested as the cover seems juvenile.

Please consider discarding this book permanently — I’m all for honesty and kids have info about sexuality — but in a responsible manner. This is not it! Thanks so much for your attention.

Copies of the banned book.

Copies of the banned book.

The juvenile cover of the book was because it’s a juvenile book. The publisher’s recommended age range for the book is 8 and older, thus it was shelved in the juvenile section. Please note the language of the letter: the parent requested the book be discarded permanently because her 10 year old was introduced to what happens when someone’s body does something it naturally does in an age appropriate manner.

My boss, rather than having my back on this, suggested I listen to the letter and pull the book from shelves all together. I told her she was wrong, and I put the book back into the juvenile section.

It is not, nor will it ever be, one parent’s duty to parent for the entirety of a group of children. Their job is to watch their child and their child alone. In the instance of Some Girls Are, one parent managed to get a book pulled as an option from a list because she felt it was “smut.” Where it would make sense to tell her child to instead read a different book, she could find no peace in that. She wanted this book removed as an option for all readers.

I’ve been out of libraries now for over a year, but I remain as dedicated as ever to teenagers and their rights. They are already subject to so much contempt culturally, and in all of my experiences, the bulk of teenagers are amazing human beings. They’re wild, awkward, funny, and even when it doesn’t seem to be the case, they really are interested in earning your adult approval. Teens face enough barriers every day, and to have a book that so carefully explores these barriers and so thoughtfully says I see you and I recognize how hard it is to be you, pulled from their hands — I fumbled mentally for what I could do to make some kind of difference for these kids. I’m privileged to have a platform here on Book Riot, as well as on my personal blog and Twitter, and because I’ve been outspoken and passionate about teens, libraries, and intellectual freedom, I had an idea. I could send down a box of 15 or 20 copies of the book for some of the kids who wanted to get the book to pick up a copy for free to keep.

As my gears began turning, I thought about the public library and wondered if I knew someone down there. Andria Amaral’s name stood out in my head after what she and her library said and did following the tragic loss of their coworker Cynthia Graham Hurd in the Charleston shooting.

I picked up the phone, called her, and asked if she’d be up for trying something out. Without hesitation, Andria was in.

On July 30, I put out a call to my readers at STACKED, asking if they’d be willing to donate a copy or two of the book. The book was available for $1 at Book Outlet, and I said I’d be happy to send any amount of books down there on my own dollar. Andria would receive them all, then she’d distribute to the teens.

The response was phenomenal:

Books began rolling into my house by the box. I took daily trips to the post office, where they tossed my mail into a laundry-style cart and rolled it out to the loading deck for me to pop into my car.

Over 830 copies of Some Girls Are (which is also part of a bind-up called What Goes Around, thus explaining the two different titles here) piled up in my guest bedroom. I suddenly realized that my ability to pay shipping for the books may be out of reach.

So I put out another call, asking if anyone would be interested in helping with shipping costs. I could box them, tape them up, address them, and cover a chunk of mailing costs.

Over $600 poured into my Paypal account from those who donated anything they could to help the cause.

The rest of the article: http://bookriot.com/2015/09/04/rising-challenge-book-internet-delivered-books-teens/

1 Comment

Filed under 2015, books

Book banning … quietly. Shhh

Florida principal tries to quietly ban book to appease Christians — sets off sh*tstorm instead

by David Ferguson

Source: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/florida-principal-tries-to-quietly-ban-book-to-appease-christians-sets-off-shtstorm-instead/

A high school principal in Tallahassee, Florida is in hot water over his unilateral decision to drop a controversial book from a summer reading list for students.

Book banning

Book banning

According to the Tallahassee Democrat, Lincoln High School Principal Allen Burch pulled The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime by Mark Haddon after a handful of Christian parents complained that the novel did not show proper reverence for God and the Christian faith.

Curious Incident is the story of a 15-year-old British math genius who is on the autism/Asperger’s Syndrome spectrum. The teenager relays everything that happens around him in the same matter-of-fact, almost emotionless tone, including some adults’ struggles with faith and a belief in God.

Burch’s decision to pull the book has caught the attention of the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) and other major freedom of information, anti-censorship organizations.

“This case is very startling. A handful of parents are making choices for every other parent in that school,” said Sarah Hoffman of the NCAC to the Democrat. “There is a reason policies are in place — to protect educators and the decisions they make.”

“This seems like a knee-jerk decision,” she continued.

But Sue Gee, one of the parents who complained about the book, feels that Curious Case is an affront to her faith and that its casual use of swear words would be harmful to students.

“I am not interested in having books banned,” said Gee, a former primary school teacher. “But to have that language and to take the name of Christ in vain — I don’t go for that. As a Christian, and as a female, I was offended. Kids don’t have to be reading that type of thing and that’s why I was asking for an alternative assignment.”

“I know it’s not realistic to pretend bad words don’t exist, but it is my responsibility as a parent to make sure that my daughter knows what is right or wrong,” she said.

But parents like Valerie Mindlin said they don’t want religious parents or any other kinds of ideologues dictating to teachers what they can and can’t teach.

“I was stunned,” said Mindlin. “I feel like it is second-guessing teachers. I never thought that the school would participate in an act of censorship. “At what point do you let parents decide the curriculum for an entire school?”

Lincoln County School Board member Alva Striplin told the Democrat that the agency is just trying to act in the best interests of students.

Striplin believes that Curious Incident should be replaced by something more innocuous.

“We are simply listening to parents’ concerns,” Striplin said. “We’ve got a million books to choose from and this one should not be on the district approval list.”

1 Comment

Filed under 2015